From: pondlife <pondlife_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:29:51 -0000

> You definitely have some points and it's not bad thinking at all, but I'm
> not sure whether configurable is on topic when discussing this patch. I
> didn't plan to introduce configurability.

Given the usefulness of a no-action button, which I think is entirely
reasonable (once you've been used to it), then the patch needs a config
option anyway IMHO.

I was mainly pointing out that as long as the core (6) buttons aren't
configurable (which they definitely shouldn't be), what's the harm? As long
as we have a line in the sand, and a clear policy, that is.

pondlife

p.s. IMO, the "ignore keypress" option is horrible when you're not able to
see the screen - it tends to result in annoying double-skips, for example.
Received on 2009-03-06