Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: committal of patch
Re: committal of patch
From: Antony Stone <Antony.Stone_at_rockbox.open.source.it>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:58:09 +0100
On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:40, Paul Louden wrote:
> This setting shouldn't be dependent upon voice. There's no reason to
> force it on people using voice who don't want beeps too.
On Sunday 14 June 2009 13:46, Al Le wrote:
> But with a setting it will be considered settings bloat and will have
> even less chances to be committed.
Who decides whether another setting is acceptable? What are the limits on how
many settings are possible / permissible?
I'm confused now about whether another setting is okay, or whether Paul's
comment that beeps and voice shouldn't be associated means that beeps can't
Is the problem with "yet another setting" the storage space required to
remember it, or the menu complexity required to provide access to it?
-- There are two possible outcomes: If the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a measurement. If the result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery. - Enrico Fermi Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.Received on 2009-06-14