From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:25:02 +0200

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Thomas Martitiz<s0523936_at_htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> He explained it already three times.

And why seems it so hard for you to accept that one explanation that
might be sufficient to *you* not necessarily is sufficient for
*somebody else*? Does this someone, given such a case, have no right
to ask again for further explanation? Is he a moron, flaming or an
idiot simply because he's not understanding the response, seeing
further issue that haven't been mentioned before (thus going one step
further with his thinking about the original problem, which usually is
a good thing, at least IMO!) or needing further clarification for
other reasons?


 - Dominik
Received on 2009-06-15