Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: State of "numerical sorting"
Re: State of "numerical sorting"
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:31:15 -0500
Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> My view on this is that we should leave natsort in, but make the
> traditional ascii sort the default for 3.3, and add a note to the
> release notes stating that it may not be in its final form, so exact
> behaviour could change in future versions.
This sounds good to me, though I'd go one step more firmly and say
"exact behaviour will change in future versions." At the very least, we
know there's a few problems with it that are going to be resolved.
Received on 2009-06-16