Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Replaygain without a setting, and other menu cleaning.
Re: Replaygain without a setting, and other menu cleaning.
From: Jeff Goode <jeffg7_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:23:22 -0400
Paul Louden wrote:
> Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> Do I misunderstand English tenses here or did you miss that it
>> actually is enabled by default since 3.2?
> Well, with English tenses that's still technically a valid sentence as
> far as I know. Whether or not it is enabled by default, you can set it
> up as "if it were enabled by default" since you're discussing a
> hypothetical situation in which you're trying to decide whether it
> should or shouldn't be.
> Despite that, though, I will admit that somehow I missed that it is
> enabled. The problem, of course, still stands. If we're talking about
> users who don't know about replaygain, which this person was, they're
> already being harmed by it being enabled by default under his reasoning.
Don't put words in my mouth. The *original* discussion was about
removing the ability to disable replay gain. You stated that you could
conceive of no scenario where if replay gain tags were present that
replay gain should not be enabled. I gave you one, and you disagreed by
claiming user error. So be it. But I did not claim harm by having
replay gain enabled by default, only harm if there was no way to disable
it short of modifying the (faulty or not) source material. Clear?
Received on 2009-06-20