From: Al Le <al.le_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:58:44 +0200

On 21.06.2009 11:14, pondlife wrote:

> Yes, but only if you want to use timestretching. 80% (or so) of the time, I
> want to change
> pitch without using timestretch so as to keep decent audio quality, thus
> IIUC I'd need to be changing both speed and pitch identically. Yes, I could
> disable timestretch, but it's still many more keypresses to do what the
> current pitch screen does fluidly - and using Rockbox for DJ-ing means
> you're always against the clock.

I wouldn't mind at all if the settings were changed through lists as I
almost change only one at a time -- depending on why I'm changing them
(I wrote about it earlier). And I agree that the pitch only needs to be
changed in semitone-based steps. 1/2 semitone-steps would be fine enough
IMO.

We'd then have to consider the case where time stretch is disabled. Then
we'd have a mismatch in how speed (which is still changed in 0.1% steps)
and pitch are set. If timestretch is disabled there would be a mismatch.
What setting would win then? Would we make speed adjustment steps match
the pitch steps?
Received on 2009-06-21