|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Packaging for Debian/UbuntuRe: Packaging for Debian/Ubuntu
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:00:31 +0200 (CEST) On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Robert Keevil wrote: > It's not really a suitable package for inclusion into the main Debian > distribution, since it changes so frequently I work in a project with bi-monthly releases (which is far more frequent than rbutil) and yet it is packaged and shipped with Debian since many years... So no, I don't think frequency is a particular argument against a Debian package. I think the fact that we provide a fine single binary that can be downloaded and run fine is an argument, since a Debian package doesn't really add a lot. -- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2009-07-10 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |