Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: FS#10199: Limiter DSP functionRe: FS#10199: Limiter DSP function
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Al Le <al.le_at_gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:03:10 +0200
On 17.08.2009 19:40, Jeff Goode wrote:
> Al Le wrote:
>> why not have a large enough buffer that would
>> be used by all DSP effects?
>>
> Most DSP functions get along well enough
> without having their input buffered anyway, so it wouldn't come up very
> often.
Ah, so this DSP effect is the only requiring a large buffer? Then OK.
But wait... What about time stretch? I think it also uses some kind of
buffer.
Received on 2009-08-17
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:03:10 +0200
On 17.08.2009 19:40, Jeff Goode wrote:
> Al Le wrote:
>> why not have a large enough buffer that would
>> be used by all DSP effects?
>>
> Most DSP functions get along well enough
> without having their input buffered anyway, so it wouldn't come up very
> often.
Ah, so this DSP effect is the only requiring a large buffer? Then OK.
But wait... What about time stretch? I think it also uses some kind of
buffer.
Received on 2009-08-17
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy