Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:25:46 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote:

> Having said that, I agree with Frank: "We can fix wording later, so let's
> not wait with actually doing things." :)

+1

go go go!

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se

Received on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 16:26:07 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Sevakis: "Re: Recording PCM format"
Previous message: Maurus Cuelenaere: "Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds"
In reply to: Maurus Cuelenaere: "Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds"
Next in thread: Mike Giacomelli: "RE: Supported vs. unsupported builds"
Reply: Mike Giacomelli: "RE: Supported vs. unsupported builds"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 17 2009 - 22:34:14 CEST