Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds
Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds
From: Rob Purchase <rob.purchase_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:59 +0100
On 18/09/2009 01:27, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> Looking at the front page now I dont think we've done enough... I
> wonder if the unsupported targets that are useable for *some* should
> be mentioned..
> something like
> "Unsupported: These are targets which have major problems for some
> people, we don't recommend trying unless you are brave. Check the
> ports information to find out its specific problems"
> and then under that the beast, d2 and maybe a few more could sit?
I agree - stating that all other ports are "unusable" is wrong, imo.
Received on 2009-09-18