Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds
Re: Supported vs. unsupported builds
From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:01:38 +0200
Rob Purchase schrieb:
> On 18/09/2009 01:27, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>> Looking at the front page now I dont think we've done enough... I
>> wonder if the unsupported targets that are useable for *some* should
>> be mentioned..
>> something like
>> "Unsupported: These are targets which have major problems for some
>> people, we don't recommend trying unless you are brave. Check the
>> ports information to find out its specific problems"
>> and then under that the beast, d2 and maybe a few more could sit?
> I agree - stating that all other ports are "unusable" is wrong, imo.
Add the D2 to unstable (we thought you'd do anyway). www/ is in SVN, it
just needs a manual update.
Received on 2009-09-18