|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Supported vs. unsupported buildsRe: Supported vs. unsupported builds
From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:01:38 +0200 Rob Purchase schrieb: > On 18/09/2009 01:27, Jonathan Gordon wrote: >> Looking at the front page now I dont think we've done enough... I >> wonder if the unsupported targets that are useable for *some* should >> be mentioned.. >> something like >> "Unsupported: These are targets which have major problems for some >> people, we don't recommend trying unless you are brave. Check the >> ports information to find out its specific problems" >> >> and then under that the beast, d2 and maybe a few more could sit? >> > I agree - stating that all other ports are "unusable" is wrong, imo. > > Rob. Add the D2 to unstable (we thought you'd do anyway). www/ is in SVN, it just needs a manual update. Received on 2009-09-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |