Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: gcc 4.4.1 & binutils 2.20
Re: gcc 4.4.1 & binutils 2.20
From: RafaŽl Carrť <rafael.carre_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:35:00 +0200
Le 10/09/2009 20:20, Thomas Martitz a ťcrit :
> So, I today decided to experiment with a newer gcc/binutils version. My
> results are very much better than the previous tests.
> While the binsize goes down quite nicely and my tested codecs (except
> flac) don't differ much in their performance, flac is for some reason
> noticeably slower.
If flac (and perhaps wma) is the only slower codec, it's worth bugging
our profiling experts to find the reason why, especially considering the
binsize decrease which could greatly help clip/c200v2 and hard disk targets
-- RafaŽl CarrťReceived on 2009-09-18