|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: gcc 4.4.1 & binutils 2.20Re: gcc 4.4.1 & binutils 2.20
From: Thomas Martitiz <s0523936_at_htw-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:44:16 +0200 Am 18.09.2009 22:35, schrieb Rafaël Carré: > Le 10/09/2009 20:20, Thomas Martitz a écrit : > >> So, I today decided to experiment with a newer gcc/binutils version. My >> results are very much better than the previous tests. >> > .. > > >> While the binsize goes down quite nicely and my tested codecs (except >> flac) don't differ much in their performance, flac is for some reason >> noticeably slower. >> > If flac (and perhaps wma) is the only slower codec, it's worth bugging > our profiling experts to find the reason why, especially considering the > binsize decrease which could greatly help clip/c200v2 and hard disk targets > > "Grealy" is probably exagerrated, 10K isn't that a big deal. Even on the clip it wouldn't really matter, since it's a flash targets. But of course, 10K more would be handy on any target :) Received on 2009-09-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |