|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Target classifications v2 ?Re: Target classifications v2 ?
From: Nicolas Pennequin <nicolas.pennequin_at_free.fr>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:02:30 +0200 Rob Purchase a écrit : > My suggestion would be: > > Gold - "top tier" ports, as per Dave's email (eg. iArchos, iHP, X5, F/X > etc) > Silver - mature ports, but with some flaws (eg. iPods, maybe Sansa AMS, > etc) > Bronze - working ports, but with significant flaws (eg. Gigabeat S, D2, > m:Robe 500, Ondas?). > > Ports that lack even basic functionality shouldn't be mentioned on the > front page (and will be covered by the link to the TargetStatus page > anyway). > > In this way the user's expectation (and level of support they can > expect) decreases naturally in each tier. Hi everyone, I was about to suggest exactly the same thing after reading the beginning of the discussion. I think this is an easier way of classifying targets, mainly because it doesn't imply the need to define a precise set of criteria. It also leaves room for the user to appreciate what he wants. What I particularly dislike in the current classification is the term "unusable", which sounds far too negative IMO. For example the Gigabeat S is far from unusable once you get past the hurdle of getting Rockbox onto it. Just my two cents. Nicolas Received on 2009-10-12 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |