From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:31:01 +0100

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:20:44PM -0500, Neil Snat wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Antony Stone <Antony.Stone_at_rockbox.open.source.it>:
> >
> > Where does the "skip" come in here, though?  Surely skip means "missing
> > something out" (either a whole track, or the remainder of the current track).
> >
> > Automatically playing the next track at the end of the current one is
> > just "continuous play" (aka "normal"), isn't it?
> >
>
> Yes, you're quite right, but as a shorthand term to differentiate
> between the natural track transition and the user deciding when to
> change track it works well.

I think "automatic track change" would work better

Frank

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

Received on 2009-11-11