From: pondlife <pondlife_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:23:33 -0000

> I'll put it back at my h340 and we'll see...

Cool - be careful!

> Your theory about the bootloader getting too big sounds feasible.

It was LinusN's theory, but the increase past the 0x400 byte mark adds
weight to it.

> So we've to have a look at the modules which form the bootloader and what
> changed in last time.

More likely we need to see if we can fix the problem that limits the size,
if it is indeed the problem.

> But how are we able to test your theory?
> Even if we lower the bootloader size - who'll brave enough to test it and
> risk another brick?

Not me ;-)

  I think this will have to be somebody who has both an H300 and a BDM
debugger. I don't know if this includes anyone except Linus - but if it
does, now would be a good time for them to speak up.

pondlife
Received on 2009-11-22