From: Mohamed Tarek <mtarek16_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 02:02:59 +0200

Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>...
> Here is my reasoning:
> 1) doing that would give users 3 weeks to tests before release
> 2) there is one week to go before freeze anyway which means no biggish
> features will go in anyway
+1 for branching this weekend.

> 3) I' not happy with the current state of the sbs stuff and want to
> commit FS#10824 and 10709 (I think thats the numbers) but doing so
> will definitely piss people off, and I'm out right not waiting a month
> more to check them in.
>...
> Jonathan
>
Since the branch should contain only stable features, or ones that are
agreed they are to be committed, what's the problem of not committing
even if the branch was delayed a bit ? (Really asking)

-- 
MT

Received on 2009-12-04