|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: themes, skins, backdrops and RAM usage... (i.e sure to be controversial)Re: themes, skins, backdrops and RAM usage... (i.e sure to be controversial)
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:00:30 -0600 Jonathan Gordon wrote: > > tiny would be text heavy but no images.. the RAM required for even a > stupidly heavy text based WPS doesnt come close to one which loads > even a single medium sized image. And the space required for text is > constant, whereas its display dependant for images. but yes, it would > act the same as the max files in folder setting. > Well the numbers can be hammered out in time. I was more just proposing that if a more technically intelligent way ends up too complicated, it'd be possible to just have a tiny/small/medium/large/giant type selection and give some general ideas about how I saw the size ranges personally when thinking about it. Received on 2009-12-21 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |