dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Proposal to update GCC for ARM

Re: Proposal to update GCC for ARM

From: Paul Louden <>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:07:22 -0600

Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Not all. But we're in the process of doing so. I verified the e200v1
> bootloader. mc2739 will test on his e200v2 (the AMS Sansas are AFAIK
> the only arm targets where the bootloader (actually, the dualboot code
> only) is critical, all other are pretty much unbrickable - correct me
> if I'm wrong).
Being unbrickable doesn't mean that bootloaders shouldn't prevent us
from upgrading.

If we can't get bootloaders to work on them now, if we ever need to
upgrade bootloaders again it's going to create more hassle down the
line. We should stick with the currently working system until
bootloaders and binaries both work 100% with the new system, or you're
just passing the work off to some future developer.
Received on 2010-03-08

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy