|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Proposal to update GCC for ARMRe: Proposal to update GCC for ARM
From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:15:54 +0100 Am 08.03.2010 22:07, schrieb Paul Louden: > Thomas Martitz wrote: >> Not all. But we're in the process of doing so. I verified the e200v1 >> bootloader. mc2739 will test on his e200v2 (the AMS Sansas are AFAIK >> the only arm targets where the bootloader (actually, the dualboot >> code only) is critical, all other are pretty much unbrickable - >> correct me if I'm wrong). >> > Being unbrickable doesn't mean that bootloaders shouldn't prevent us > from upgrading. > > If we can't get bootloaders to work on them now, if we ever need to > upgrade bootloaders again it's going to create more hassle down the > line. We should stick with the currently working system until > bootloaders and binaries both work 100% with the new system, or you're > just passing the work off to some future developer. Sure. I agree. Received on 2010-03-08 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |