From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:07:13 +0100

Am 09.03.2010 00:48, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> The AMS Sansas are in a bad situation w.r.t. to test_codec. Their low
> memory doesn't permit running test_codec on most test files since test
> codec wants the full file in ram (you can basically only test upto
> 128kbit/s). But if someone tested gigabeatfx, it should give quite
> similar results since they have almost the same processor.
>
> I don't think the extra function call overhead caused by long calls
> are noticeable.
>
> Best regards.

Alright, I added Sansa Fuze results to
http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparison

As I said, most test files where skipped by test_codec. But those which
are, show that the new compiler performs the same as the current one.

Best regards.
Received on 2010-03-09