Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Handling NoDo featuresRe: Handling NoDo features
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:17:45 -0500
On 3/23/2010 3:13 PM, Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> Anyway, without a rational the NODO list is kind of bizarre. We
> should have a
So how do you give an objective rationale why one feature is worth the
size, and another isn't? Some things will have to be subjective, it's
just a given.
Received on 2010-03-23
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:17:45 -0500
On 3/23/2010 3:13 PM, Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> Anyway, without a rational the NODO list is kind of bizarre. We
> should have a
So how do you give an objective rationale why one feature is worth the
size, and another isn't? Some things will have to be subjective, it's
just a given.
Received on 2010-03-23
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy