Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Handling NoDo features
Re: Handling NoDo features
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:57:13 -0500
On 3/23/2010 4:51 PM, Dominik Riebeling wrote:
> Sure, but giving a subjective reason (like "it's not worth the effort
> / binsize increase / ...) is at least better than having no reason at
> all, and the majority of developers agreeing on a subjective reason is
> good enough imo. If the NoDo items are discussed on a regular basis
> (like the proposed discussion on each years DevCon) such reasons also
> have to stand. Which obviously means that if there isn't a majority
> for holding up the subjective reason then it's no longer a NoDo item.
> I completely agree with Frank here.
Frank didn't say anything about subjective reasons. I'm the one who said
a subjective reason ought to be good enough.
Frank wanted "All NoDo items must have a proper rationale" which sounds
much more significant than just a subjective reason. Maybe I
misunderstood, but I tend to understand a rationale to be something more
significant than "it's not worth the effort"
Received on 2010-03-23