|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: NoDo or not?Re: NoDo or not?
From: Jeff Goode <jeffg7_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:25:31 -0400 On 3/29/2010 05:57, Nils wrote: > I would rather see a solution for completely remapping the keys than > this scheme with one or a few remappable buttons only. > I know this has been argued to death over and over but the only two > arguments against it are > a) support nightmare > b) unwanted complexity > > a) is easily dealt with by telling users to use the default mapping if > they want help or if something doesn't work. > > b) I don't think this will make rockbox significantly more complex > than having just one or a few configurable buttons > > One other problematic thing is that not all buttons can be used in > combos, but we can just (try to) document that and leave the > resposibility to the user. > > The button or combo for resetting settings can be hardcoded or simply > checked before a custom mapping is loaded so the default is used. > I just want a key I can assign on the fly so I don't have to drill down to context menus all the time. I don't want user-switchable keymaps. I don't want to have to load an entirely new keymap just to change functions. I merely want what I want, when I want it. :) Received on 2010-03-29 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |