From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:36:31 +1100

On 29 March 2010 01:09, Thomas Martitz
<thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of this idea, it sounds like [un]necessary complication to me
> which adds way more code that some settings in the .cfg. I also don't see
> the advantage over (hidden) .cfg settings.

The point of this is to allow users/themers to arbitrarily add
configurability to their themes without needing to hack at the real
code. I'm not very imaginative but I'm sure someone who is can come up
with heaps of uses.

To be clear, the config file for this would be completly seperate from
config.cfg or core settings.

And Paul, yes it would mean people would need to manually edit a text
file (Oh the humanity!)

>
> My other concern is that we should focus on fixing the existing bugs before
> introducing even more features (related to the skin engine).
Such as?
Received on 2010-03-31