From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:46:48 -0500

On 4/9/2010 4:40 PM, Dominik Riebeling wrote:
>
> Yes, as far as I understand. Why should backward compatibility behave
> differently than current behaviour is? If I load a bookmark neither
> pitch nor speed are affected, as neither of them is saved in the
> bookmark. I don't see any reason why this should change. Unless, of
> course, these values are stored in the bookmark.
>
>

I'd have to agree here. At first I felt like setting it to 100% when no
value was set made a sort of basic sense.

But thinking a while since the original email went up, I now thing it
makes more sense not to change things. It's not really "backward
compatible" if it starts messing with the original behaviour - leave it
as it is and if people want old bookmarks to have pitch values in them
now, they can just re-save the bookmark.
Received on 2010-04-09