Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Probable changes coming to the skin engine (skin format)Re: Probable changes coming to the skin engine (skin format)
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Chris <rockbox_at_chrisjj.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:15 +0100 (BST)
> Also, the recent new tags expose the limitations of the old syntax
> (well, there was no fixed syntax) and therefore create huge
> inconstency. Better readability is also a concern.
I don't doubt the new syntax is preferable. What I was trying to
understand is the necessity of the old's removal.
Perhaps it is just the advantage of reduced source burden is thought to
outweigh the disadvantage of skin breakage?
Chris
Received on 2010-05-11
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:15 +0100 (BST)
> Also, the recent new tags expose the limitations of the old syntax
> (well, there was no fixed syntax) and therefore create huge
> inconstency. Better readability is also a concern.
I don't doubt the new syntax is preferable. What I was trying to
understand is the necessity of the old's removal.
Perhaps it is just the advantage of reduced source burden is thought to
outweigh the disadvantage of skin breakage?
Chris
Received on 2010-05-11
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy