|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Cowon D2 EABIRe: Cowon D2 EABI
From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:14:30 +1000 On 14 June 2010 08:54, Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de> wrote: > Also, as you just said you haven't been around lately, it's hard for our > project, considering the growing number of targets, to wait for a port > maintainer to actually show up and do some work. If the maintainer is not > around, then the port is effectively not maintained. It can get broken if it > remains unmaintained. > I found that remark hugely rude and inappropriate. No one has ever come up with a reason why we need to use the same compiler for all targets, and when a port only has a few maintainers then why the hell is anything happening to code for that target without an OK from the people who own the device. I am equally annoyed at the change to ACTUAL TARGET CODE WHICH WAS UNTESTED! http://svn.rockbox.org/viewvc.cgi?view=rev;revision=26832 If that happens in the future then send an email to the dev mailing list (or the maintainer) or create a bug for it, NEVER commit code to target which you personally cant test on when it is a hardware specific change. Jonathan Received on 2010-06-14 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |