Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: [RaaA] Weekly status report
Re: [RaaA] Weekly status report
From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:38:09 +0200
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:28:36AM +1000, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> for b we should at least skirt the issue and put the executable next
> to .rockbox/ and then the paths are obvious (so it is portable
> app....). I guess OS dependant paths do make sense, but do we really
> need to worry about that yet?
Since the project is "Rockbox as an Application", and using proper paths
is somewhat essential to be a well-behaved application, I think skirting
the issue is not an option.
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. KernighanReceived on 2010-06-14