Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Destructors in Theme Editor: virtual or non virtual?Destructors in Theme Editor: virtual or non virtual?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Al Le <Al.Le_at_gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:27:07 +0200
Hello.
Out of curiosity I looked at the code of the Theme Editor which is written in C++. And saw, e.g. in the class SkinViewer, that the destructor is declared as a non-virtual function. But shouldn't (almost always) destructors be declared as virtual functions so that the framework (Qt in this case) can correctly destroy custom objects?
Just digging out some long forgotten C++ rests out of my memory...
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:27:07 +0200
Hello.
Out of curiosity I looked at the code of the Theme Editor which is written in C++. And saw, e.g. in the class SkinViewer, that the destructor is declared as a non-virtual function. But shouldn't (almost always) destructors be declared as virtual functions so that the framework (Qt in this case) can correctly destroy custom objects?
Just digging out some long forgotten C++ rests out of my memory...
-- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dslReceived on 2010-06-17
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy