Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Destructors in Theme Editor: virtual or non virtual?Re: Destructors in Theme Editor: virtual or non virtual?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Al Le <Al.Le_at_gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:05:43 +0200
> You are perfectly right. When deriving from a class, the destructor should
> always be virtual in order to call the destructor of the base class.
Hrm... I'd understand it the other way around: it should be virtual so that the correct (of the derived class) destructor is called when the object is destroyed by the framework (probably a call via a pointer to a base class).
But the net effect is the same ! :-)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:05:43 +0200
> You are perfectly right. When deriving from a class, the destructor should
> always be virtual in order to call the destructor of the base class.
Hrm... I'd understand it the other way around: it should be virtual so that the correct (of the derived class) destructor is called when the object is destroyed by the framework (probably a call via a pointer to a base class).
But the net effect is the same ! :-)
-- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dslReceived on 2010-06-17
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy