Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: [RaaA] Weekly status reportRe: [RaaA] Weekly status report
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:46:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> For a redistributable .zip (if we want that) we probably could stick to the
> single .rockbox approach, but for compiling from source and for
> distributions/windows installers we want something more application typical
> I think.
IMHO, binary RaaA packages should use "native" packaging and installing
methods. That means .debs and .rpms on Linux and installer-things on Windows.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:46:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> For a redistributable .zip (if we want that) we probably could stick to the
> single .rockbox approach, but for compiling from source and for
> distributions/windows installers we want something more application typical
> I think.
IMHO, binary RaaA packages should use "native" packaging and installing
methods. That means .debs and .rpms on Linux and installer-things on Windows.
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2010-06-22
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy