From: Alex Parker <parker.alex.e_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:25:05 +0200

On 22 June 2010 18:46, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>
> For a redistributable .zip (if we want that) we probably could stick to
>> the single .rockbox approach, but for compiling from source and for
>> distributions/windows installers we want something more application typical
>> I think.
>>
>
> IMHO, binary RaaA packages should use "native" packaging and installing
> methods. That means .debs and .rpms on Linux and installer-things on
> Windows.
>
>
And .tar.xz (Arch)! Seriously though, .deb and .rpm covers most, and
minority people like me can build from source (or do our own packages for
different distros).
Received on 2010-06-23