Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Skin buffer sizeRe: Skin buffer size
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Rafaël Carré <rafael.carre_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:57:32 +0200
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:27:50 +0200
Edgar Toernig <froese_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Rafaël Carré wrote:
> > The Clip+ has the same amount than Clipv2 (8MB + 1MB IRAM)
> >
> > Clipv1 has 2MB + 320kB IRAM
>
> Is it possible that the skin buffer, which is in the BSS, is placed in
> the IRAM and doesn't affect the track buffer?
Only if it is explicitely declared it with IBSS_ATTR
Received on 2010-07-16
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:57:32 +0200
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:27:50 +0200
Edgar Toernig <froese_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Rafaël Carré wrote:
> > The Clip+ has the same amount than Clipv2 (8MB + 1MB IRAM)
> >
> > Clipv1 has 2MB + 320kB IRAM
>
> Is it possible that the skin buffer, which is in the BSS, is placed in
> the IRAM and doesn't affect the track buffer?
Only if it is explicitely declared it with IBSS_ATTR
-- ✍ Rafaël Carré ☺
- application/pgp-signature attachment: signature.asc
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy