From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:33:37 +1000

On 15 September 2010 16:26, Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>  On 9/15/2010 1:23 AM, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>>
>> Then your complain should be why we dont have a better way of
>> communicating interesting changes to users which has come up plenty of
>> times and noone cares enough to set it up. Using the commit log for
>> this is just plain bloody wrong.
>>
>> A blog has been "green lighted" but the dev group and just needs
>> someone to set it up, so why not use some of your energy into making
>> things better instead of just complaining?
>
> I notice you didn't explain how clear commits is "bad" still. Even if we had
> a blog, there's no good reason for commit messages to be unclear or not make
> any attempt to tell what happened.
>
> So instead of trying to turn this into another discussion, why not just
> explain why commit messages aren't needed?
>

ok, do this... http://www.ohloh.net/p/rockbox/contributors/17085379909957
is a link to my ohloh rockbox stats.... find a single commit which
shows is a non trivial fix commit that suggests I think commit
messages arent needed... then we you dont, go back to working on
integrating a blog into the frontpage.
Received on 2010-09-15