Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Segfault with Faster MDCT patch and -fPIC
Re: Segfault with Faster MDCT patch and -fPIC
From: Dave Hooper <dave_at_beermex.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:29:59 +0100
I suppose gcc doesn't actually know whether I want to use the value of pic
or not, when I explicitly say register("r10"). So I think it's assuming I do
want the value of pic and that 'i know what I'm doing'. If I unrolled those
macros somewhat so that I don't need to keep registers live across macros it
would probably make it easier + cleaner.
On 20 Sep 2010 11:22, "Dave Hooper" <dave_at_beermex.com> wrote:
> Meant to type r10 not t10
> > That looks weird to me! R10 still holds one side of the previous
> > calculation but loo...
Received on 2010-09-20