From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:47:03 -0500

  On 10/11/2010 12:43 PM, David Hall wrote:
> I also believe that the +2 threshold should initially be a tentative
> one, subject to later review by the RSB. The ultimate goal, IMHO,
> should be an improvement to the overall happiness of the developer
> community.
>
> I can envision a cultural divide where a simple +2 threshold leads to a
> nearly 50/50 split of the community - with the result being increasingly
> hardened battle-lines and all the negative results that implies.
>
> The answer, however, likely won't be known until a point in time weeks
> if not months after this experiment is put to the test. Therefore a
> previously agreed upon ability to change the threshold allows the rules
> to be tweaked in order to best achieve the goal.
>
>

I'd like to propose one additional step - at the time the patch is
posted on flyspray, the person seeking to have it committed sends an
email out to the -dev list. Also, if a patch has been on flyspray for
some time, and has just reached committable status, then they send out
the email to -dev at that time. The week begins based on when the -dev
email is sent, rather than when the patch is posted to flyspray, but
affirmations / objections must be on flyspray (or in one place, but that
seems the most logical to me at this time) so that they don't need to be
collected across multiple sources, and so there's a clear record.
Received on 2010-10-11