|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: rolling stable buildsRe: rolling stable builds
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:22:47 +0200 On 2010-10-19 05:17, Jonathan Gordon wrote: > My view would be that any bugfix for a flyspray task would be a > candidate to go in the stable branch. Fixes which are too fiddly to > backport would probably miss out (or at that point we talk about a new > minor stable build (but 3.7.3 -> 3.8)). I think that this is a great idea. Backporting bugfixes to the stable branch is IMHO the way to go. > I was really hoping to get more feedback, if no one cares about > talking about it there is a good chance no one will bother with the > work of keeping the stable branch updated and tested and working. This > simply wont work if only a few people look after the branch. As I see it, the biggest problem we have today is keeping up with all the targets and being able to do proper (regression) testing. Most of us only have a few targets, and are rarely using more than one target on a daily basis. I think the best solution would be to have one maintainer for each target, who can test each release on his target before every release. Linus Received on 2010-10-19 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |