|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: FS#11686 - Kinetic list scrolling for touchscreenRe: FS#11686 - Kinetic list scrolling for touchscreen
From: Alex Parker <parker.alex.e_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:05:28 +0200 On Monday 25 October 2010 23:57:45 Thomas Martitz wrote: > On 25.10.2010 23:14, Alex Parker wrote: > > I think you got no objections after a good number of days, which works > > for me. I suspect the lack of response may slightly be down to the > > relative lack of people with touchscreen targets (although a few have > > android phones). > > > > Alex > > The "no objections" system is the system we always used. Now I'm trying > to test the vote-system which was proposed in the other thread for new > features. I think "no objections" shouldn't be enough to get something > in in this system (except maybe in a few rare cases). In fact I don't > expect objections for this feature, so I would've committed it right > away in the "no objections" system. > > But "no objections" often also means that people cannot/don't want to > comment because they don't feel familiar enough with the corresponding > code. Should we wait for people who feel familiar and comfortable enough > to vote or should be perhaps ask a few people directly in order to get > the vote (and explain the problem/feature to them)? > > But I think since we're talking about new features (which also implies > new code in most cases) here familiarity with the code isn't necessarily > to give an opinion or even a vote. Voting also doesn't mean code review, > it's just a +1 or -1 on the feature. > For bug fixes on the other hand familiarity with the code is more > important, and hence the vote system not suitable. > > Best regards. This is all true, but there has to be a cut off somewhere - the week you left seems reasonable. Anyway, I'll happily give you a +1 on the feature, so no need for no objections :) Alex Received on 2010-10-26 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |