From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:37:23 +1100

On 2 November 2010 08:56, Thomas Martitz
<thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> Am 01.11.2010 22:42, schrieb Jonathan Gordon:
>
>> RaaA is not the only touchscreen target,
>
> But your mail and mine before was about reverting on RaaA. Why argue with
> the Ondas now?
> I maintain that there's nothing to fix on RaaA. So why would you want to
> revert it for RaaA too?

I said it should be definitely reverted for the onda and should be
reverted on raaa too.

> My admission was that that changing the default possibly gets the stone
> rolling, not doing nothing. And that doing nothing changes nothing. You
> somehow mixed that up.
>
> There are no regressions on unusable targets.

changing the default causes the onda to get into a state where it is
impossible to get out of, that is FACT. that also means you
intentionally broke it. The fact that it happens to be unusable is
irrelevant.

>
> Speaking of my admission:
>>
>> Reverting android also gives you more motivation to fix it instead of
>> being lazy
>
> As I noted in my above and opening mail: I think the opposite is the case
> (assuming there was anything to fix on android/RaaA, which isn't the case).
>
> Best regards.
>

It should be reverted on both targets, that will give you the
motivation to fix it properly on all touchscreen targets and not rely
on per target #defines to set the correct default. Amazingly I have
absolutly no faith that you will fix onda if it is left in this state.
You want this change, you broke onda, it is your responsibility to fix
it.
Received on 2010-11-01