Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: FS#6321 - Universal Image ViewerRe: FS#6321 - Universal Image Viewer
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Jonas Häggqvist <rasher_at_rasher.dk>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:20:46 +0100
On 09-11-2010 18:35, Marcin Bukat wrote:
> BTW. Aren't viewers bind to particular file extensions? If so I
> wouldn't bother to do
> any more advanced detection. If someone rename .bmp to .jpg it's
> his/her problem.
The thing is that the image viewer lets you "browse" images on its own, so
it has to do its own detection. Why not be smart about it rather than dumb?
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:20:46 +0100
On 09-11-2010 18:35, Marcin Bukat wrote:
> BTW. Aren't viewers bind to particular file extensions? If so I
> wouldn't bother to do
> any more advanced detection. If someone rename .bmp to .jpg it's
> his/her problem.
The thing is that the image viewer lets you "browse" images on its own, so
it has to do its own detection. Why not be smart about it rather than dumb?
-- Jonas Häggqvist rasher(at)rasher(dot)dkReceived on 2010-11-09
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy