(2010/11/10 1:16), Alex Parker wrote:
> On 9 November 2010 16:57, Teruaki Kawashima<kamekun_at_r6.dion.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for suggestion and information.
>> I agree that it would be better to look for magic number.
>> but I'll leave it for now unless it causes serious problem that judging by
>> file-extension.
>>
>> teru
>>
>
> Whether going on file extensions generally works or not, is there a reason
> not to use the magic numbers seeing as everyone seems to have agreed that
> that would be better?
>
> Alex
>

The patch is already large enough to me and I don't feel like to add
another feature which might introduce another issue.
It can be changed to use magic number later if it is desired.

teru
Received on 2010-11-10