dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: i2c unification

Re: i2c unification

From: Michael Sparmann <>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:35:04 +0100

Am 09.12.2010 22:02, schrieb Marcin Bukat:
> Hello rockboxers,
> It is over a week since I sent my mail asking for opinons about i2c
> unification. Should I consider no feedback (almost) as 'ok we like the
> idea, go ahead and clean this up'?
> Marcin

I, personally, have the impression that you're over-complicating things
a bit. Do we really need that I2C handler registration thing? Or would a
(multivolume-like) bus index passed to all the I2C handling functions do
equally good with less bloat? IIUC the handler function could do the
registration stuff internally for targets that really need it.

Also, how do the drivers for the I2C devices know which bus to use?
#define WMCODEC_BUS 0 etc. in firmware/export/config/[target].h?


Received on 2010-12-09

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy