From: sideral <asieoniezi_at_gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:35:03 +0100

Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> writes:

> The main difference between the original feature and mine's goals are
> this: He prefers automation and protection of "precious" resume
> points. I prefer explicit activation/use, and lowered likelihood of
> accidental interference with non-resume playback. Our suggestions
> offer, for the vast majority, the same functionality but approach it
> from two angles - one with the most potential to resume when someone
> who only uses it sometimes doesn't want to resume, and one with the
> most potential to not resume when someone who only uses it sometimes
> wanted to resume.

This characterization is largely correct. Thanks for summing it up this
way!

> That, and far less options in the menu to reach similar functionality.

This I would put differently: With the options I propose, it's possible
to turn the automation on or off selectively.

sideral
Received on 2010-12-27