From: Thomas Martitz <kugel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:00:03 +0200

Am 02.07.2011 12:26, schrieb Torne Wuff:
> On 2 July 2011 09:15, Jonathan Gordon<jdgordy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2 July 2011 02:02, Torne Wuff<torne+rockboxdev_at_wolfpuppy.org.uk> wrote:
>>> SVN branches I intend to file under oldheads: gigabeat-s, mdctexp,
>>> skinenginebreak. As far as I know these have all actually been
>>> submitted to trunk and are no longer being developed.
>>>
>> There is no need to keep skinenginebreak either.
> There's also no need to actually delete it; it has some of history in
> it and git's delta compression is *ridiculous* (the entire history of
> SVN is ~135MB). It won't get fetched when people clone the repo.
>

Isn't it proper to delete branches when the work for them is done?

Best regards.
Received on 2011-07-02