From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:32:04 +1000

On 23 August 2011 10:27, Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I disagree with the first part of this change.
>> Time & date doesnt make any more sense in settings than it does in
>> "system" (or "info" if you want to rename it). time&date isnt a
>> setting. And it does make sense to keep anything related (sleep timers
>> and alarms) together,
>>
>>
>
> Unless Time and Date became immutable while I wasn't looking and can't
> be set by the user, I'd say they're settings. It could possibly be
> argued that the screen where you view the time and date could be
> separated from the setting that allows you to set them, but there is
> absolutely a setting involved. The design of the setting menu may be
> non-standard in that it, for some reason, previews the values by
> showing them on layer above where you set them, but that doesn't
> instantly make it "not a setting."
>

What has how you set it got anything to do with it being a setting or
not? Time does not magically change when you give your DAP to your
sibling.
Received on 2011-08-23