From: Hayden Pearce <saint.lascivious_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:35:32 +1200

On Aug 29, 2011 6:24 PM, "Johannes Linke" <johannes.linke_at_gmx.de> wrote:

> As users will need Settings way more often than System, it seems absurd to
give System a higher priority and move Settings one level down.

Did you actually look at the proposed layouts?
No one is suggesting both System *and* Setting be top level menu items, I
think maybe you've confused yourself or allowed others to do so.

System and Settings will be *merged*, so that basically all the items from
Settings will go to the System menu (either under the sub-menu of Settings,
or directly under the System menu entry), and there will no longer be a top
level Settings entry.

Go back to the first mail from this thread and review the proposed
layout(s).

[Saint]
Received on 2011-08-29