From: Hayden Pearce <saint.lascivious_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:36:30 +1200

Bah! I misread your mail.

Apologies.
On Aug 29, 2011 6:35 PM, "Hayden Pearce" <saint.lascivious_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2011 6:24 PM, "Johannes Linke" <johannes.linke_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> As users will need Settings way more often than System, it seems absurd
to
> give System a higher priority and move Settings one level down.
>
> Did you actually look at the proposed layouts?
> No one is suggesting both System *and* Setting be top level menu items, I
> think maybe you've confused yourself or allowed others to do so.
>
> System and Settings will be *merged*, so that basically all the items from
> Settings will go to the System menu (either under the sub-menu of
Settings,
> or directly under the System menu entry), and there will no longer be a
top
> level Settings entry.
>
> Go back to the first mail from this thread and review the proposed
> layout(s).
>
> [Saint]
Received on 2011-08-29