Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Git/gerrit migration status and next steps
Re: Git/gerrit migration status and next steps
From: Thomas Jarosch <tomj_at_simonv.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:48:44 +0200
On Wednesday, 7. September 2011 09:42:12 bryan.childs_at_rbs.com wrote:
> > Do we really want to allow commits directly? so little of our code ever
> > gets reviewed so I would quite happily force everyone to go through
> > gerrit and require someone else to OK it. It isnt hard to get someone
> > else in IRC to have a quick look and push the button.
> Absolutely against requiring this.
> We trust committers to do "the right thing".
> If you have a patch you think needs this - submit to refs/for/master.
> For small commits, this would be a completely pain in the arse, and
> totally unwarranted.
Second this. Can gerrit be configured to request a review optionally?
Let's say one touches an unfamiliar area of the code (f.e. tagcache),
then it would be nice to request a review.
Received on 2011-09-07