|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: ARM backtraceRe: ARM backtrace
From: Torne Wuff <torne+rockboxdev_at_wolfpuppy.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:41:14 +0100 On 1 October 2011 10:32, Marcin Bukat <marcin.bukat_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/12302 adds backtrace log to the > panic screen on ARMs. This is simple port of > http://www.mcternan.me.uk/ArmStackUnwinding/. The approach to take > this backtrace is not perfect and has limitations BUT it doesn't need > any special symbols or something to unwind stack frames. I am aware > that the code itself would need some polish (unneeded typedefs, dos > line ends etc.) but first I am interested if we want something like > this at all. I played a bit with this inserting asm snippet causing > data abort in various places and produced backtrace looked reasonable > - still more tests needed. Thanks for doing this! I'll experiment with it later, but for now I was wondering if you've measured the binsize impact of it? I expect it's small since that's the point of the original library, but I'm curious exactly what it comes to on Rockbox. -- Torne Wuff torne_at_wolfpuppy.org.ukReceived on 2011-10-01 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |